In the fraught context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, inflammatory language wields a destructive power that has far-reaching consequences. When individuals on opposing sides resort to using derogatory and dehumanizing terms such as “animals” or “beasts” to describe one another, the results are undeniably detrimental.

One of the most profound impacts of such inflammatory language is the dehumanization of the “other.” When individuals are reduced to subhuman status through this kind of discourse, it creates a psychological chasm that can lead to the rationalization of violence against them. In essence, it becomes easier to harm those whom we do not see as fellow human beings. This dehumanization is a profound source of division and it blurs the line between conflict and cruelty.

Additionally, inflammatory language heightens existing tensions, adding fuel to an already fiery situation. It fosters an environment characterized by hostility, anger, and deep-seated resentment. Degrading labels and derogatory terms are being thrown around making it increasingly challenging for parties to find common ground or engage in constructive dialogue.

Furthermore, inflammatory language often sets in motion a cycle of hate and revenge. When one group uses derogatory terms to describe another, it inevitably triggers anger and a desire for retaliation. This vicious cycle perpetuates violence — as individuals and groups seek to avenge the perceived insults and dehumanization, leaving little room for reconciliation.

In terms of diplomacy and peace negotiations, inflammatory language poses a significant hindrance as well. It breeds mutual mistrust and animosity. As a result, the chances of progress toward peace and reconciliation are severely derailed. One should hold media and responsible persons accountable for falsities and language abuses as they address fellow humans — especially those that are weak and cannot defend themselves. This is just what humans do!

Allah Certainty Knows Best.